This might seem out of character here, but I wanted to go into some of the things I’ve been reading. Most of my research into Munchausen’s by Internet came as a result of over ten years exposure to online support groups in various forms. I’ve witnessed some truly selfish, narcissistic people using these forums and support groups as supply, feeding their need for attention at any costs. I can honestly admit I’ve been fooled completely now twice.
The first time was in the previously mentioned pregnancy support group, now six years ago. There was a member that went by the name of Gina/Ohmybelly who claimed to have had testing done early in her pregnancy, and it was determined by these tests she was carrying a boy. However, some months later, she went into very early labor and delivered a premature baby girl. She was called out on her lies and fake pictures, and disappeared into the web. She may be out there now masquerading in any form, or she may have learned her lesson that it’s downright evil to mess with the sympathies of pregnant people.
I have also been fooled more recently. This is also someone I’ve “known” now since 2002, and has referred to me in a recent pregnancy forum as a “dear, dear friend” that has lit candles and done Wiccan rituals for her. (Alrighty then, how about that one?) I don’t have the server space to list all the illnesses and “bad times” she’s encountered. I wanted to believe her and did for many years, based on the fact that she was a multiple miscarriage and domestic violence survivor like I am, and a Gulf War veteran (and I still don’t know if that’s true either). However, her miscarriage rate is now in the double digits, she’s had cancer a few times, seizures, mental illness, a suicidal child close in age to my daughter, and more and more and more. And now, after being in remission for a few years and being on disability for her seizures, she has found herself pregnant for the umpteenth time. And of course, this has to be a high-risk pregnancy. Supposedly she found out her imaginary fetus has it’s heart and possibly other organs growing outside it’s body, coincidently, a few weeks after the May 1st episode of Grey’s Anatomy showing the very same thing! Hmmm, you say?
I’ve disassociated myself with her and her followers. My fear though is that using her fantastic imagination, she is preying on the emotions of another group of expecting mothers. And my greater fear is that she might end up with more than Hallmarks & sympathy emails, that a fund-raiser might be started. Now I can’t prove without a shadow of a doubt that her pregnancy is imaginary, which was also featured on Grey’s, but she’s offered no belly pictures, no ultrasounds, no doctor’s names, no specifics other than what you could copy and paste from online resources.
In light of my experience, I wanted to offer my readers this, linked from the source, MUNCHAUSEN BY INTERNET: FAKING ILLNESS ONLINE:
Clues to Detection of False Claims
Based on experience with two dozen cases of Munchausen by Internet, I have arrived at a list of clues to the detection of factititous Internet claims. The most important follow:
- the posts consistently duplicate material in other posts, in books, or on health-related websites;
- the characteristics of the supposed illness emerge as caricatures;
- near-fatal bouts of illness alternate with miraculous recoveries;
- claims are fantastic, contradicted by subsequent posts, or flatly disproved;
- there are continual dramatic events in the person’s life, especially when other group members have become the focus of attention;
- there is feigned blitheness about crises (e.g., going into septic shock) that will predictably attract immediate attention;
- others apparently posting on behalf of the individual (e.g., family members, friends) have identical patterns of writing.
Lessons
Perhaps the most important lesson is that, while most people visiting support groups are honest, all members must balance empathy with circumspection. Group members should be especially careful about basing their own health care decisions on uncorroborated information supplied in groups. When Munchausen by Internet seems likely, it is best to have a small number of established members gently, empathically, and privately question the author of the dubious posts. Even though the typical response is vehement denial regardless of the strength of the evidence, the author typically will eventually disappear from the group. Remaining members may need to enlist help in processing their feelings, ending any bickering or blaming, and refocusing the group on its original laudable goal.